Re: "unexpected EOF" messages - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Reykja
Subject Re: "unexpected EOF" messages
Date
Msg-id CALDgxVvf9DHUSr8DNRq1TQSoFxWrcFGPjm2OxyvRePr4n+uETA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "unexpected EOF" messages  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: "unexpected EOF" messages
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Would we consider adding such a switch (it should be easy enough to
> do), or do we want to push this off to the mythical "let's improve the
> logging subsystem" project that might eventually materialize if we're
> lucky? Meaning - would people object to such a switch?

Yes, if the new parameter allows a generic filter on multiple
user-specified message types.

Are you answering the "Would we consider" or the "would people object"?
 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: "unexpected EOF" messages
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: "unexpected EOF" messages