Re: "unexpected EOF" messages - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: "unexpected EOF" messages
Date
Msg-id CABUevExLTsvB2M1JEK2DBM0a4LQ4GH-CgCb2j4CwXUThEV-qtQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "unexpected EOF" messages  (Vik Reykja <vikreykja@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Vik Reykja <vikreykja@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Would we consider adding such a switch (it should be easy enough to
>> > do), or do we want to push this off to the mythical "let's improve the
>> > logging subsystem" project that might eventually materialize if we're
>> > lucky? Meaning - would people object to such a switch?
>>
>> Yes, if the new parameter allows a generic filter on multiple
>> user-specified message types.
>
>
> Are you answering the "Would we consider" or the "would people object"?

Oh, nice catch - I guess my phrasing of those two questions was really stupid :)

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vik Reykja
Date:
Subject: Re: "unexpected EOF" messages
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: "unexpected EOF" messages