On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 11:07 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> writes:
> > Currently we do not include the dependent extension information for
> > index and materialized view in the describe command. I felt it would
> > be useful to include this information as part of the describe command
> > like:
> > \d+ idx_depends
> > Index "public.idx_depends"
> > Column | Type | Key? | Definition | Storage | Stats target
> > --------+---------+------+------------+---------+--------------
> > a | integer | yes | a | plain |
> > btree, for table "public.tbl_idx_depends"
> > Depends:
> > "plpgsql"
>
> > Attached a patch for the same. Thoughts?
>
> This seems pretty much useless noise to me. Can you point to
> any previous requests for such a feature? If we did do it,
> why would we do it in such a narrow fashion (ie, only dependencies
> of two specific kinds of objects on one other specific kind of
> object)? Why did you do it in this direction rather than
> the other one, ie show dependencies when examining the extension?
While implementing logical replication of "index which depends on
extension", I found that this information was not available in any of
the \d describe commands. I felt having this information in the \d
describe command will be useful in validating the "depends on
extension" easily. Now that you pointed out, I agree that it will be
better to show the dependencies from the extension instead of handling
it in multiple places. I will change it to handle it from extension
and post an updated version soon for this.
Regards,
Vignesh
