Re: Important lag in replication streaming between master and standby - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Luca Ferrari
Subject Re: Important lag in replication streaming between master and standby
Date
Msg-id CAKoxK+6GOq-3C8OftzyU0ksrcDC_aqe6xX_+CyLhYw8LJrPj2w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Important lag in replication streaming between master and standby  (Mai Peng <maily.peng@webedia-group.com>)
List pgsql-admin
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 5:21 PM Mai Peng <maily.peng@webedia-group.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I’ve got several times this error : "requested WAL segment 000000020000A01A0000004F has already been remove". I think
it’sdue to the lag between our master in EU zone and our standby in US zone. 
> How could we configure Postgres to handle this issue?

As others already stated, you can use either wal_keep_segments or
replication_slots with advantages and drawbacks on both sides. One
thing to point out, also, since you did not provide a lot of
information, is that if you have another slave consuming wals, it
could remove (archive_cleanup) segments ignoring other slaves.

Personally, I would go for a replication slot and see if the lag can
be kept under control (i.e., the pg_wal directory does not grow too
much).

Luca



pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: soumitra bhandary
Date:
Subject: Re: Important lag in replication streaming between master and standby
Next
From: "AL-Temimi, Muthana"
Date:
Subject: question