Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Hi,
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 10:30 AM Jakub Wartak
<jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>Hi,

> > Yeah, that's why I was mentioning to use a "shared" populate_buffercache_entry()
> > or such function: to put the "duplicated" code in it and then use this
> > shared function in pg_buffercache_pages() and in the new numa related one.
>
> OK, so hastily attempted that in 7b , I had to do a larger refactor
> there to avoid code duplication between those two. I don't know which
> attempt is better though (7 vs 7b)..
>

I'm attaching basically the earlier stuff (v7b) as v8 with the
following minor changes:
- docs are included
- changed int8 to int4 in one function definition for numa_zone_id

-J.