On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 11:20 AM Jakub Wartak
<jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 10:30 AM Jakub Wartak
> <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> >Hi,
>
> > > Yeah, that's why I was mentioning to use a "shared" populate_buffercache_entry()
> > > or such function: to put the "duplicated" code in it and then use this
> > > shared function in pg_buffercache_pages() and in the new numa related one.
> >
> > OK, so hastily attempted that in 7b , I had to do a larger refactor
> > there to avoid code duplication between those two. I don't know which
> > attempt is better though (7 vs 7b)..
> >
>
> I'm attaching basically the earlier stuff (v7b) as v8 with the
> following minor changes:
> - docs are included
> - changed int8 to int4 in one function definition for numa_zone_id
.. and v9 attached because cfbot partially complained about
.cirrus.tasks.yml being adjusted recently (it seems master is hot
these days).
-J.
