Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f9mTF3yJHe2inW8JzFdWLZNf-_JJCaZY3vnwr6N3ouN8A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 25 October 2018 at 17:05, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2018/10/25 12:54, David Rowley wrote:
>> On 25 October 2018 at 16:46, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>> +                                                                * key, one for each zero-valued partattrs */
>>>
>>> How about: for each zero-valued member of partattrs?
>>
>> Aren't arrays made up of elements?   I did have "element" on the end,
>> but I didn't think it was worth having the extra line caused by the 80
>> line length limit, so I deleted it.
>>
>> Seems "element" is mentioned 73 times in [1], but "member" does not
>> get a mention.
>>
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Array_data_structure
>
> I thought they can be used interchangeably, but perhaps not.

A struct or a class has members.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData