Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f9TATZvSheK0mxyK7iMeaji5gqFMqUCfiRBO1c23O5GrQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 30 March 2018 at 18:38, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Please find attached the updated patches.

Thanks.

I've noticed that there are no outfuncs or readfuncs for all the new
Step types you've added.

Also, the copy func does not properly copy the step_id in the base
node type. This will remain at 0 after a copyObject()


-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2
Next
From: Marina Polyakova
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors