On 14 February 2017 at 21:25, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> + Aggregate</> stage. For such cases there is clearly going to be no
> + performance benefit to using parallel aggregation.
>
> A comma is required after "For such cases"
Added
>> The query planner takes
>> + this into account during the planning process and will choose how to
>> + perform the aggregation accordingly.
>
> This part of the sentence sounds unclear. It doesn't clearly
> indicate that planner won't choose a parallel plan in such cases.
I thought that was obvious enough giving that I'd just mentioned that
there's clearly no benefit, however I've changed things to make that a
bit more explicit.
Thanks for reviewing this.
Updated patch attached.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
