On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:17 AM, David Rowley
<david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 14 February 2017 at 21:25, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> + Aggregate</> stage. For such cases there is clearly going to be no
>> + performance benefit to using parallel aggregation.
>>
>> A comma is required after "For such cases"
>
> Added
>
>>> The query planner takes
>>> + this into account during the planning process and will choose how to
>>> + perform the aggregation accordingly.
>>
>> This part of the sentence sounds unclear. It doesn't clearly
>> indicate that planner won't choose a parallel plan in such cases.
>
> I thought that was obvious enough giving that I'd just mentioned that
> there's clearly no benefit, however I've changed things to make that a
> bit more explicit.
>
> Thanks for reviewing this.
>
> Updated patch attached.
Committed and back-patched to 9.6.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
