Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f-MNBvW02061H+QmDDvWv-mSM9fmce9b45=67NtkhdP+w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 30 November 2017 at 15:34, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:17 PM, David Rowley
<david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> The remove_singleton_appends_examples_of_differences_2017-11-15.patch
> which I've attached applies changes to the regression tests to make
> many of the major tables partitioned tables with a single partition.
> It also changes the expected results of the small insignificant plan
> changes and leaves only the actual true differences. This file is not
> intended for commit, but more just a demo of it working for a larger
> variety of plan shapes. There is actually no additional tests with the
> patch. It relies on the places in the existing tests which have
> changed.  I didn't add any extra as I can't think of any particular
> area to target given that it's such a generic thing that can apply to
> so many different cases.

The last patch set does not apply and did not get any reviews. So I am
moving this item to the next with waiting on author as status.

(returning from 2 weeks leave)

Thanks for managing the commitfest.

I've attached a patch which fixes the conflict with the regression test expected output in inherits.out. I've also made changes to the expected output in the new partition_prune test's expected output.

I'll set this back to waiting on review now.

--
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql - additional extra checks
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] <> join selectivity estimate question