[ NOT ] LEAKPROOF is accepting separately , So why you written [ NOT ] LEAKPROOF with | IMMUTABLE | STABLE | VOLATILE |
The commit message doesn't say - but I can see how from a technical perspective that the claim that something is immutable is considered similar to a claim that something has no side effects, thus there is a connection. As noted below, the fact that the first three are mutually exclusive while leakproof is not is convincing enough a reason to list leakproof separately.
Please separate the [ NOT ] LEAKPROOF from the OR list
I would agree, and would add that I wonder whether the syntax for the three mutually exclusive options should be shown as such instead of having to read that in the description notes. Does writing < | { IMMUTABLE | STABLE | VOLATILE } > work?
Note: Your documentation must be correct
Is that so? It is a good thing then that it is presently correct and that this is just a readability suggestion. The presence of them all on the same line does not by itself imply any kind of relationship in the actual grammar.
