Le mardi 13 décembre 2022, 16:13:34 CET Tom Lane a écrit : > Accordingly, I find nothing at all attractive in this proposal. > I think the main thing it'd accomplish is to drive users back to > the bad old days of ordering-by-subquery, if they have a requirement > we failed to account for.
I think the ability to mark certain aggregates as being able to completely ignore the ordering because they produce exactly the same results is still a useful optimization.
I seriously doubt that users are adding unnecessary ORDER BY clauses to their aggregates. The more compelling use case would be existing ORMs that produce such problematic SQL - are there any though?
I'm more keen on the idea of having the system understand when an ORDER BY is missing - that seems like what users are more likely to actually do. But it doesn't seem all that useful given the lack of aggregates that would actually use it meaningfully.
