Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Facebook
Downloads
Home
>
mailing lists
Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From
Mark Rofail
Subject
Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
Date
May 16, 2018
14:31:50
Msg-id
CAJvoCus5o0+X7+DVHzd-eTRdi48fA0h7yNpHO05=qGN=Jyfb1A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
Raw
In response to
Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
(Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses
Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
List
pgsql-hackers
Tree view
I was wondering if anyone knows the proper way to write a benchmarking test for the @>> operator. I used the below script in my previous attempt
https://gist.github.
com/markrofail/
174ed370a2f2ac24800fde2fc27e2d
38
The script does the following steps:
1. Generate Table A with 5 rows
2. Generate Table B with n rows such as:
every row of Table B is an array of IDs referencing rows in Table A.
The tests we ran previously had Table B up to 1 million rows and the results can be seen here :
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJvoCusMuLnYZUbwTBKt%2Bp6bB9GwiTqF95OsQFHXixJj3LkxVQ%40mail.gmail.com
How would we change this so it would be more exhaustive and accurate?
Regards,
Mark Rofail
pgsql-hackers
by date:
Previous
From:
Dmitry Ivanov
Date:
16 May 2018, 14:27:09
Subject:
Re: [HACKERS] Planning counters in pg_stat_statements
Next
From:
Etsuro Fujita
Date:
16 May 2018, 15:30:23
Subject:
Re: Postgres 11 release notes
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
I confirm that I have read and accepted PostgresPro’s
Privacy Policy
.
I agree to get Postgres Pro discount offers and other marketing communications.
✖
×
×
Everywhere
Documentation
Mailing list
List:
all lists
pgsql-general
pgsql-hackers
buildfarm-members
pgadmin-hackers
pgadmin-support
pgsql-admin
pgsql-advocacy
pgsql-announce
pgsql-benchmarks
pgsql-bugs
pgsql-chat
pgsql-cluster-hackers
pgsql-committers
pgsql-cygwin
pgsql-docs
pgsql-hackers-pitr
pgsql-hackers-win32
pgsql-interfaces
pgsql-jdbc
pgsql-jobs
pgsql-novice
pgsql-odbc
pgsql-patches
pgsql-performance
pgsql-php
pgsql-pkg-debian
pgsql-pkg-yum
pgsql-ports
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-ru-general
pgsql-sql
pgsql-students
pgsql-testers
pgsql-translators
pgsql-www
psycopg
Period
anytime
within last day
within last week
within last month
within last 6 months
within last year
Sort by
date
reverse date
rank
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to
Privacy Policy
.
I accept cookies