On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Asif Naeem <anaeem.it@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Haribabu,
>
> Thank you for sharing the patch. I have spent some time to review the
> changes. Overall patch looks good to me, make check and manual testing seems
> run fine with it. There seems no related doc/sgml changes ?. Patch added
> network_smaller() and network_greater() functions but in PG source code,
> general practice seems to be to use “smaller" and “larger” as related
> function name postfix e.g. timestamp_smaller()/timestamp_larger(),
> interval_smaller/interval_larger(), cashsmaller()/cashlarger() etc. Thanks.
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
I corrected the function names as smaller and larger.
and also added documentation changes.
Updated patch attached in the mail.
Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia
