Re: Parallel Seq Scan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Haribabu Kommi
Subject Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Date
Msg-id CAJrrPGfJDmzOVbLZoDho3KTAEZAn6Avoy+c0n9OeZH86qg1F7Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel Seq Scan  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> As mentioned previously [1], we have to do two different things to make
> this work, Robert seems to have taken care of one of those (basically
> second point in mail[1]) and still another one needs to be taken care
> which is to provide support of reading subplans in readfuncs.c and that
> will solve the problem you are seeing now.

Thanks for the information.
During my test, I saw a plan change from parallel seq scan to seq scan
for the first reported query.
So I thought that all scenarios are corrected as not to generate the
parallel seq scan.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: some pg_rewind usability issues