On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> 2. I think it's probably a good idea - at least for now, and maybe > >>> forever - to avoid nesting parallel plans inside of other parallel > >>> plans. It's hard to imagine that being a win in a case like this, and > >>> it certainly adds a lot more cases to think about. > >> > >> I also think that avoiding nested parallel plans is a good step forward. > > > > Doing that as a part of the assess parallel safety patch was trivial, so I did. > > > > I tried with latest HEAD code, seems to be problem is present in other > scenarios. >
As mentioned previously [1], we have to do two different things to make
this work, Robert seems to have taken care of one of those (basically
second point in mail[1]) and still another one needs to be taken care
which is to provide support of reading subplans in readfuncs.c and that
