Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Haribabu Kommi
Subject Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Date
Msg-id CAJrrPGc7w4aB17zHh-S4xvZRg-CTE8cDxsX7yHW4H-sGrTJN2g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)  (Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
List pgsql-hackers


On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:


On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks for the patch. This shows a very good performance improvement.


Thank you. Can you please share the benchmark you ran, results and observations? 

I just ran a performance test on my laptop with minimal configuration, it didn't show much
improvement, currently I don't have access to a big machine to test the performance.

 
I started reviewing the patch, during this process and I ran the regression
test on the WARM patch. I observed a failure in create_index test.
This may be a bug in code or expected that needs to be corrected.

Can you please share the diff? I ran regression after applying patch on the current master and did not find any change? Does it happen consistently?


Yes, it is happening consistently. I ran the make installcheck. Attached the regression.diffs file with the failed test.
I applied the previous warm patch on this commit - e3e66d8a9813d22c2aa027d8f373a96d4d4c1b15

 
Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress
Next
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscription