Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 2:15 PM Drouvot, Bertrand
<bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 11/27/23 7:02 AM, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) wrote:
> > On Monday, November 27, 2023 12:03 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Attach the V38 patch set which addressed all comments in [1][2] except for the
> >> ones that mentioned above.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPv-yu71ogj_hRi6cCtmD5
> >> 5bsyw7XTxj1Nq8yVFKpY3NDQ%40mail.gmail.com
> >> [2]
> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPuEGX5kr0xh06yv8ndoA
> >> QvDNedoec1OqOq3GMxDN6p%3D9A%40mail.gmail.com
> >
> > I didn't increment the patch version, sorry for that. Attach the same patch set
> > but increment the patch version to V39.
>
> Thanks!
>
> It looks like v39 does not contain (some / all?) the changes that have been
> done in v38 [1].
>
> For example, slot_exists_in_list() still exists in v39 while it was renamed to
> validate_sync_slot() in v38.
>

Yes, I noticed that and informed Hou-san about this. New patches will
be posted soon with the correction. Meanwhile, please review v38
instead if you intend to review patch002 right now.  v39 is supposed
to have changes in patch001 alone.

thanks
Shveta


thanks
Shveta