Hi,
On 11/27/23 7:02 AM, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) wrote:
> On Monday, November 27, 2023 12:03 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>> Attach the V38 patch set which addressed all comments in [1][2] except for the
>> ones that mentioned above.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPv-yu71ogj_hRi6cCtmD5
>> 5bsyw7XTxj1Nq8yVFKpY3NDQ%40mail.gmail.com
>> [2]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPuEGX5kr0xh06yv8ndoA
>> QvDNedoec1OqOq3GMxDN6p%3D9A%40mail.gmail.com
>
> I didn't increment the patch version, sorry for that. Attach the same patch set
> but increment the patch version to V39.
Thanks!
It looks like v39 does not contain (some / all?) the changes that have been
done in v38 [1].
For example, slot_exists_in_list() still exists in v39 while it was renamed to
validate_sync_slot() in v38.
[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJpy0uD6dWUvBgy8MGdugf_Am4pLXTL_vqcwSeHO13v%2BMzc9KA%40mail.gmail.com
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
