Re: Add contrib/pg_logicalsnapinspect - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From shveta malik
Subject Re: Add contrib/pg_logicalsnapinspect
Date
Msg-id CAJpy0uCgAQ5JeunSV2cXiLSegxKK5=DzRZOnJLcbyS82pwZjeg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add contrib/pg_logicalsnapinspect  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 4:21 PM Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Yeah, good idea. Done that way in v3 attached.
>

Thanks for the patch. +1 on the patch's idea. I have started
reviewing/testing it. It is WIP but please find few initial comments:

src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c:

1)
+ fsync_fname("pg_logical/snapshots", true);

Should we use macros PG_LOGICAL_DIR and  PG_LOGICAL_SNAPSHOTS_DIR  in
ValidateSnapshotFile(), instead of hard coding the path


2)
Same as above in pg_get_logical_snapshot_meta() and
pg_get_logical_snapshot_info()

+ sprintf(path, "pg_logical/snapshots/%X-%X.snap",
+ LSN_FORMAT_ARGS(lsn));                        LSN_FORMAT_ARGS(lsn));

3)
+#include "replication/internal_snapbuild.h"

Shall we name new file as 'snapbuild_internal.h' instead of
'internal_snapbuild.h'. Please see other files' name under
'./src/include/replication':
worker_internal.h
walsender_private.h

4)
+static void ValidateSnapshotFile(XLogRecPtr lsn, SnapBuildOnDisk *ondisk,
+ const char *path);

Is it required? We generally don't add declaration unless required by
compiler. Since definition is prior to usage, it is not needed?

thanks
Shveta



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow logical failover slots to wait on synchronous replication