On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 2:03 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I noticed that we are not having any check for skipping temporary
> table insertion.
>
> You should also include temporary tables check here, as parallel
> workers might not have access to temporary tables.
>
Thanks Vignesh, you are right, I need to test this and add it to the
list of further exclusions that the patch needs to check for.
Hopefully I can provide an updated patch soon that caters for these
additional identified cases.
Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia