David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm a bit unsure about llast()'s new double evaluation of the list.
> Perhaps I can add a new inline function named list_last_cell() to get
> around that... Or maybe it doesn't matter. I'm not quite sure what's
> best there.
Double evaluation bad, especially in a macro that has not had such a
hazard for the last twenty-plus years.
It might not be worth mucking with llast, as it's not used very heavily
I believe. But if it is, then let's add another inline function.
regards, tom lane
