Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 weekly progress reports (week 2) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Borodin
Subject Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 weekly progress reports (week 2)
Date
Msg-id CAJEAwVHEszXJR-zx0hedH_SxdD0ZsoRcBvV7=GpiSE1RCeimpQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 weekly progress reports (week 2)  (Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 weekly progress reports (week 2)  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 weekly progress reports (week 2)  (Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
2017-06-13 18:00 GMT+05:00 Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com>:
>
> Project: Explicitly support predicate locks in index AMs besides b-tree
>
Hi, Shubham
Good job!

So, in current HEAD test predicate_gist_2.spec generate false
positives, but with your patch, it does not?
I'd suggest keeping spec tests with your code in the same branch, it's
easier. Also it worth to clean up specs style and add some words to
documentation.

Kevin, all, how do you think, is it necessary to expand these tests
not only on Index Only Scan, but also on Bitmap Index Scan? And may be
KNN version of scan too?
I couldn't find such tests for B-tree, do we have them?

Best regards, Andrey Borodin, Octonica.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Data at rest encryption
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Data at rest encryption