Hi,
> On 04.10.23 16:37, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 03.10.23 13:28, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> >> While examining the code for similar places I noticed that the
> >> following functions can also be const'ified:
>
> >> - XLogRegisterData (?)
> >
> > I don't think this would work, at least without further work elsewhere,
> > because the data is stored in XLogRecData, which has no const handling.
>
> I got around to fixing this. Here is a patch. It allows removing a few
> unconstify() calls, which is nice.
LGTM.
Note that this may affect third-party code. IMO this is not a big deal
in this particular case.
Also by randomly checking one of the affected non-static functions I
found a bunch of calls like this:
XLogRegisterData((char *) msgs, ...)
... where the first argument is going to become (const char *). It
looks like the compilers are OK with implicitly casting (char*) to a
more restrictive (const char*) though.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
