Hi,
> Pretty sure that reopening an already rejected patch that is competing
> with compression dictionaries (which the rest of us are currently
> focusing on) will achieve anything.
Ooops, I didn't mean to be sarcastic:
s/will achieve/will not achieve/
My apologies.
> Consider joining the compression
> dictionaries effort instead [1]. During the discussion with the
> community it ended up being a TOAST improvement after all. So we could
> use your expertise in this area.
>
> [1]: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/43/3626/
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
