Re: rand48 replacement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aleksander Alekseev
Subject Re: rand48 replacement
Date
Msg-id CAJ7c6TM2qJdtehyLA79gFtZ+h7jwRrksK4ZAW7boxgQJqQkRAw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: rand48 replacement  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: rand48 replacement
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Fabien,

> To summarize:
>   - better software engineering
>   - similar speed (slightly slower)
>   - better statistical quality
>   - quite small state
>   - soundness

Personally, I think your patch is great. Speaking of the speed I
believe we should consider the performance of the entire DBMS in
typical scenarios, not the performance of the single procedure. I'm
pretty sure in these terms the impact of your patch is neglectable
now, and almost certainly beneficial in the long term because of
better randomness.

While reviewing your patch I noticed that you missed
test_integerset.c. Here is an updated patch.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: rand48 replacement