Hello Aleksander,
>> - better software engineering
>> - similar speed (slightly slower)
>> - better statistical quality
>> - quite small state
>> - soundness
>
> Personally, I think your patch is great.
Thanks for having a look!
> Speaking of the speed I believe we should consider the performance of
> the entire DBMS in typical scenarios, not the performance of the single
> procedure.
Sure. I tested a worst-case pgbench script with only "\set i random(1,
100000000)" on a loop, the slowdown was a few percents (IFAICR < 5%).
> I'm pretty sure in these terms the impact of your patch is neglectable
> now, and almost certainly beneficial in the long term because of better
> randomness.
>
> While reviewing your patch I noticed that you missed test_integerset.c.
> Here is an updated patch.
Indeed. Thanks for the catch & the v2 patch!
--
Fabien.
