On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 15:29, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 9:33 AM Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Regression tests that use \d+ to show the table details might
> > not be interested specifically in table access method. But these will
> > fail if run with a modified default access method.
>
> I see your point, but if a test is not interested specifically in a table am,
> then I guess it wouldn't use a custom table am in the first place, right?
Right. It wouldn't use a custom table am. But I mean, despite not
using a custom table am, the test would fail if the regression runs
with a changed default access method, because the regression output
file has only one particular am value output.
> Anyway, I don't have strong opinion here, so if everyone agrees that HIDE_TABLEAM
> will show/hide access method unconditionally, I'm fine with that.
Yeah, I agree it's subjective.
--
Thanks,
-Amit Khandekar
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
