> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:01 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> The patchset is now pretty granularly split into individual pieces.
Wow, thanks!
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 9:33 AM Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Regression tests that use \d+ to show the table details might
> not be interested specifically in table access method. But these will
> fail if run with a modified default access method.
I see your point, but if a test is not interested specifically in a table am,
then I guess it wouldn't use a custom table am in the first place, right? Any
way, I don't have strong opinion here, so if everyone agrees that HIDE_TABLEAM
will show/hide access method unconditionally, I'm fine with that.
