Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Khandekar
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id CAJ3gD9dw9jtox3m8R3ZC+Fm6x5dMhQb==b5=vmSrFi2PukzohA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 26 April 2017 at 00:28, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> So what I'd prefer -- on
> the totally unprincipled basis that it would let us improve
> performance in the future -- if you operate on a partition directly,
> you fire the partition's triggers, but if you operate on the parent,
> only the parent's triggers fire.

I would also opt for this behaviour.

Thanks,
-Amit Khandekar
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password