On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 10:19, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 8:29 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 5:44 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 2:31 PM Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Ok. I tested pg94_95_use_vfd_for_logrep.patch for 9.6 branch, and it
>>> > works there. So please use this patch for all the three branches.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Pushed!
>>
>>
>>
>> I see one failure in REL_10_STABLE [1] which seems to be due to this commit:
>>
>
> I tried this test on my CentOs and Power8 machine more than 50 times, but couldn't reproduce it. So, adding Noah to
seeif he can try this test [1] on his machine (tern) and get stack track or some other information?
>
> [1] - make -C src/test/recovery/ check PROVE_TESTS=t/006_logical_decoding.pl
I also tested multiple times using PG 10 branch; also tried to inject
an error so that PG_CATCH related code also gets covered, but
unfortunately didn't get the crash on my machine. I guess, we will
have to somehow get the stacktrace.
>
> --
> With Regards,
> Amit Kapila.
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Thanks,
-Amit Khandekar
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
