Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Yuya Watari
Subject Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Date
Msg-id CAJ2pMkYgCc=JsyQjMMKxVuSi1g6Ny8YZS6YSLsXrebA4mwy0OQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions  (Yuya Watari <watari.yuya@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
List pgsql-hackers
Hello,

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 2:32 PM Yuya Watari <watari.yuya@gmail.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately, I've been busy due to work, so I won't be able to
> respond for several weeks. I'm really sorry for not being able to see
> the patches. As soon as I'm not busy, I will look at them, consider
> the above approach, and reply to this thread. If there is no
> objection, I will move this CF entry forward to next CF.

Since the end of this month is approaching, I moved this CF entry to
the next CF (January CF). I will reply to this thread in a few weeks.
Again, I appreciate your kind reviews and patches.

--
Best regards,
Yuya Watari



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V
Next
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve rowcount estimate for UNNEST(column)