On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone;
>
> I have been starting to experiment with the JSON accessors in 9.3. I
> immediately found that my preferred use, populating nested composite types,
> is not supported. Also of course one cannot manipulate JSON nodes, which
> leads to the question of how best to do this. I had some ideas:
>
> 1. A custom C function utilizing the internal functions PostgreSQL offers
> for JSON parsing (probably looking at the json_populate_record() as a base)
>
> 2. Utilizing hstore as an intermediate representation along with
> json_each()
>
> 3. Perhaps using something like pl/perlu or the like.
>
> This leads to a few questions, including whether it would be worthwhile
> looking at trying to handle nested types in json_populate_record() and if
> anyone is working on such a thing currently.
Can we see a hypothetical example? json best practices for me are to
use standard tables and than serialize/deserialize json as it goes
through the door and not use nested composite types in your actual
table definitions. I think it should all fit if you do it right: you
json_[each/array_elements] the wrapping json then insert it into
un-nested actual tables. If you must have a final destination as a
nested composite, I think at the worst case you might have to make
some transition composites...
merlin
