Re: Streaming replication: sequences on slave seemingly ahead of sequences on master - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: Streaming replication: sequences on slave seemingly ahead of sequences on master
Date
Msg-id CAHyXU0y29QQPQqLZ3B+nYNy84qPOKtsMorarCk7Sajn83MYytQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Streaming replication: sequences on slave seemingly ahead of sequences on master  (Michael Nolan <htfoot@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Michael Nolan <htfoot@gmail.com> wrote:
> To cross-pollinate with another thread, if temporary tables (and
> insert/delete/update transactions to them) are to be supported on a slave,
> will the applications using those temporary tables expect to be able to use
> 'nextval' on inserts to temporary tables as well?

That's a good question.  I re-asked it for you on -hackers on the GTT
thread. Look for follow ups there.

merlin

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Streaming replication: sequences on slave seemingly ahead of sequences on master
Next
From: leaf_yxj
Date:
Subject: Re: How to know there is any ODBC Driver installed in the Linux redhat 5.7 server? Thanks