Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
Date
Msg-id CAHut+PtrTTnwdyYUkZiz8UXhV_m_QEYKGWnTG2LN+P0P=29-gQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses RE: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 11:40 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 8:45 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 7:53 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:33 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > Few comments on both the patches:
> > > v4-0001*
> > > =========
> > > 1.
> > > Furthermore, if the table uses
> > > +   <literal>REPLICA IDENTITY FULL</literal>, specifying a column list is not
> > > +   allowed (it will cause publication errors for <command>UPDATE</command> or
> > > +   <command>DELETE</command> operations).
> > >
> > > This line sounds a bit unclear to me. From this like it appears that
> > > the following operation is not allowed:
> > >
> > > postgres=# create table t1(c1 int, c2 int, c3 int);
> > > CREATE TABLE
> > > postgres=# Alter Table t1 replica identity full;
> > > ALTER TABLE
> > > postgres=# create publication pub1 for table t1(c1);
> > > CREATE PUBLICATION
> > >
> > > However, what is not allowed is the following:
> > > postgres=# delete from t1;
> > > ERROR:  cannot delete from table "t1"
> > > DETAIL:  Column list used by the publication does not cover the
> > > replica identity.
> > >
> > > I am not sure if we really need this line but if so then please try to
> > > make it more clear. I think the similar text is present in 0002 patch
> > > which should be modified accordingly.
> > >
> >
> > The "Furthermore…" sentence came from the commit message [1]. But I
> > agree it seems redundant/ambiguous, so I have removed it (and removed
> > the same in patch 0002).
> >
>
> Thanks, pushed your first patch.
>

Thanks for the push.

I have rebased the remaining patch (v6-0001 is the same as v5-0002)

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Different compression methods for FPI
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization