On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 2:20 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 8:17 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Summary
> > -------
> >
> > In summary, everything I have tested so far appeared to be working
> > properly. In other words, for overlapping streamed transactions of
> > different kinds, and regardless of whether zero/some/all of those
> > transactions are getting processed by a PA worker, the resulting
> > replicated data looked consistently OK.
> >
>
> Thanks for doing the detailed testing of this patch. I think the one
> area where we can focus more is the switch-to-serialization mode while
> sending changes to the parallel worker.
>
> >
> > NOTE - all testing described in this post above was using v58-0001
> > only. However, the point of implementing these as a .spec test was to
> > be able to repeat these same regression tests on newer versions with
> > minimal manual steps required. Later I plan to fetch/apply the most
> > recent patch version and repeat these same tests.
> >
>
> That would be really helpful.
>
FYI, my pub-sub.spec tests gave the same result (i.e. pass) when
re-run against the latest v62-0001 (parallel apply base patch) and
v62-0004 (GUC 'force_stream_mode' patch).
------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
