On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>>>> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>>>> Jim Nasby wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think things like pageinspect are very different; I really can't see any
>>>>>> use for those beyond debugging (and debugging by an expert at that).
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think that necessarily means it must continue to be in contrib.
>>>>> Quite the contrary, I think it is a tool critical enough that it should
>>>>> not be relegated to be a second-class citizen as it is now (let's face
>>>>> it, being in contrib *is* second-class citizenship).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Attached patch is latest patch.
>>>
>>> The previous patch lacks some files for regression test.
>>> Attached fixed v12 patch.
>>
>> The patch could be applied cleanly. "make check" could pass successfully.
>> But "make check-world -j 2" failed.
>>
>
> Thank you for looking at this patch.
> Could you tell me what test you got failed?
> make check-world -j 2 or more is done successfully in my environment.
I tried to do the test again, but initdb failed with the following error.
creating template1 database in data/base/1 ... FATAL: invalid
input syntax for type oid: "f"
This error didn't happen when I tested before. So the commit which was
applied recently might interfere with the patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
