Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Here are few things I have noticed:
>> +   for (i = 0; i < max_wal_senders; i++)
>> +   {
>> +       walsnd = &WalSndCtl->walsnds[i];
>> No volatile pointer to prevent code reordering?
>>
>>   */
>>  typedef struct WalSnd
>>  {
>> +   int     slotno;         /* index of this slot in WalSnd array */
>>     pid_t       pid;            /* this walsender's process id, or 0 */
>> slotno is used nowhere.
>>
>> I'll grab the tests and look at them.
>
> So I had a look at those tests and finished with the attached:
> - patch 1 adds a reload routine to PostgresNode
> - patch 2 the list of tests.

Thanks for updating the patches!

Attached is the refactored version of the patch.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao