Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Here are few things I have noticed:
>>> +   for (i = 0; i < max_wal_senders; i++)
>>> +   {
>>> +       walsnd = &WalSndCtl->walsnds[i];
>>> No volatile pointer to prevent code reordering?
>>>
>>>   */
>>>  typedef struct WalSnd
>>>  {
>>> +   int     slotno;         /* index of this slot in WalSnd array */
>>>     pid_t       pid;            /* this walsender's process id, or 0 */
>>> slotno is used nowhere.
>>>
>>> I'll grab the tests and look at them.
>>
>> So I had a look at those tests and finished with the attached:
>> - patch 1 adds a reload routine to PostgresNode
>> - patch 2 the list of tests.
>
> Thanks for updating the patches!
>
> Attached is the refactored version of the patch.

Thanks. This looks good to me.

.gitattributes complains a bit:
$ git diff n_sync --check
src/test/recovery/t/007_sync_rep.pl:22: trailing whitespace.
+       $self->reload;
-- 
Michael