Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwG36ZDsc0YJKDOK-kaJ+ed-XrVOKZHRGcfmZ+DVBBhJ_g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:52 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-05-15 02:45:21 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value
> >
> > The document for VACUUM explains
> >
> >     boolean
> >     Specifies whether the selected option should be turned on or off.
> >     You can write TRUE, ON, or 1 to enable the option, and FALSE, OFF,
> >     or 0 to disable it.
> >
> > But VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value as follows.
> >
> >     =# VACUUM (INDEX_CLEANUP 1);
> >     ERROR:  syntax error at or near "1" at character 23
> >     STATEMENT:  VACUUM (INDEX_CLEANUP 1);
> >
> > This looks a bug. The cause of this is a lack of NumericOnly clause
> > for vac_analyze_option_arg in gram.y. The attached patch
> > adds such NumericOnly. The bug exists only in 12dev.
> >
> > Barring any objection, I will commit the patch.
>
> Might be worth having a common rule for such options, so we don't
> duplicate the knowledge between different places.

Yes. Thanks for the comment!
Attached is the updated version of the patch.
It adds such common rule.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: PSA: New intel MDS vulnerability mitigations cause measurableslowdown
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value