Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwFyP=b6gMfOeoPRt-mFC-4pjo_JyEmSw+=5PMK_RVLytQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> Jim Nasby wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think things like pageinspect are very different; I really can't see any
>>>> use for those beyond debugging (and debugging by an expert at that).
>>>
>>> I don't think that necessarily means it must continue to be in contrib.
>>> Quite the contrary, I think it is a tool critical enough that it should
>>> not be relegated to be a second-class citizen as it is now (let's face
>>> it, being in contrib *is* second-class citizenship).
>>>
>>
>> Attached patch is latest patch.
>
> The previous patch lacks some files for regression test.
> Attached fixed v12 patch.

The patch could be applied cleanly. "make check" could pass successfully.
But "make check-world -j 2" failed.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: BRIN INDEX value
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Core dump with nested CREATE TEMP TABLE