On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 6:08 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-09-28 19:45, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I think that rather than adding error
> > checks that were not there before, the right path to fixing this is
> > to cause these settings to be ignored if we're doing crash recovery.
>
> That makes sense to me.
+1
> Something like this (untested)?
Yes, but ArchiveRecoveryRequested should be checked instead of
InArchiveRecovery, I think. Otherwise recovery targets would take effect
when recovery.signal is missing but backup_label exists. In this case,
InArchiveRecovery is set to true though ArchiveRecoveryRequested is
false because recovery.signal is missing.
With the attached patch, I checked that the steps that I described
upthread didn't reproduce the issue.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
