Re: Standby accepts recovery_target_timeline setting? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Standby accepts recovery_target_timeline setting?
Date
Msg-id 80f09951-0ff9-791e-af7b-7e28839db52c@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Standby accepts recovery_target_timeline setting?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Standby accepts recovery_target_timeline setting?
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-09-28 19:45, Tom Lane wrote:
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I think that rather than adding error
> checks that were not there before, the right path to fixing this is
> to cause these settings to be ignored if we're doing crash recovery.

That makes sense to me.  Something like this (untested)?

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index 0daab3ff4b..25cae57131 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -5618,6 +5618,13 @@ recoveryStopsBefore(XLogReaderState *record)
     TimestampTz recordXtime = 0;
     TransactionId recordXid;

+    /*
+     * Ignore recovery target settings when not in archive recovery (meaning
+     * we are in crash recovery).
+     */
+    if (!InArchiveRecovery)
+        return false;
+
     /* Check if we should stop as soon as reaching consistency */
     if (recoveryTarget == RECOVERY_TARGET_IMMEDIATE && reachedConsistency)
     {
@@ -5759,6 +5766,13 @@ recoveryStopsAfter(XLogReaderState *record)
     uint8        rmid;
     TimestampTz recordXtime;

+    /*
+     * Ignore recovery target settings when not in archive recovery (meaning
+     * we are in crash recovery).
+     */
+    if (!InArchiveRecovery)
+        return false;
+
     info = XLogRecGetInfo(record) & ~XLR_INFO_MASK;
     rmid = XLogRecGetRmid(record);



-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL12 and older versions of OpenSSL
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory Accounting