On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:50:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Good catch. So I will remove start_xact code later.
>>> > Attached patch removes start_xact from PSQLexec.
>>> Nothing negative to say here :)
>>> Patch simply removes the second argument of PSQLexec that was set to
>>> the same value everywhere, aka false as noticed by Heikki. Comments
>>> and code blocks related to this parameter are removed, and the code
>>> compiles, passing check-world as well (just kicked the tests in case).
>>
>> Uh, where are we on this? Should I commit it?
> The patch cleaning up the dead code of psql could be clearly applied
> now. For the feature itself not sure, it may be better to let
> Fujii-san manage it.
Applied.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
