On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 3:05 PM Saul, Jean Paolo
<paolo.saul@verizonconnect.com> wrote:
> Can anyone please shed some light as to why this works?
> The only thing I could think of is a locking issue with the leaf nodes.
I describe why in the original thread about the problem and my
approach, though it's very low level stuff. See:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAH2-Wzmf0fvVhU+SSZpGW4Qe9t--j_DmXdX3it5JcdB8FF2EsA@mail.gmail.com
> How much testing is required for this to be considered a proper bug?
You haven't really demonstrated a substantial regression across
versions (17361.186258 tps on v11, down from 20137.416962 tps on 9.5),
which is the only way that this could get classified as a bug. It's a
*far* smaller difference than the difference that you show between
otherwise-similar high cardinality and low cardinality indexes. In
general, I'm confused about why you're concerned about v11 in
particular here.
--
Peter Geoghegan
