Re: BUG #15609: synchronous_commit=off insert performance regressionwith secondary indexes - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Saul, Jean Paolo
Subject Re: BUG #15609: synchronous_commit=off insert performance regressionwith secondary indexes
Date
Msg-id CA+73ANffu7xZDPOAtH5=jNsN2eyOWx8Dw0R4Hi_92pxqm4=1Ag@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #15609: synchronous_commit=off insert performance regressionwith secondary indexes  ("Saul, Jean Paolo" <paolo.saul@verizonconnect.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #15609: synchronous_commit=off insert performance regressionwith secondary indexes
List pgsql-bugs
Hi All,


I have found a short term workaround for this. You recreate the index with an added second column with high-cardinality.
ex. CREATE INDEX ON test_indexes USING BTREE (low_cardinality_column, primary_key_id);

We have around 1,500 tables with low-cardinality indexes, so its not the best workaround but one that restores the performance bump for PG11.

Can anyone please shed some light as to why this works?
The only thing I could think of is a locking issue with the leaf nodes.

How much testing is required for this to be considered a proper bug?


Cheers,

Paolo



PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING THIS EMAIL

VERIZON CONNECT CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination, reliance upon or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the addressee is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete this message. Thank you.

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15572: Misleading message reported by "Drop function operation" on DB with functions having same name
Next
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #15628: Error while installing postgreSQL