Re: could not read block 0 in file : read only 0 of 8192 bytes whendoing nasty on immutable index function - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: could not read block 0 in file : read only 0 of 8192 bytes whendoing nasty on immutable index function
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzn_4+FMDkdcy=iQqW28Y2aeCmKeZo947Wed4t0o4oLBxQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: could not read block 0 in file : read only 0 of 8192 bytes whendoing nasty on immutable index function  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: could not read block 0 in file : read only 0 of 8192 bytes whendoing nasty on immutable index function  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: could not read block 0 in file : read only 0 of 8192 bytes whendoing nasty on immutable index function  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 9:00 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I don't think that's particularly relevant. We should always register an
> invalidation before the relevant CommandCounterIncrement(), because that
> is what makes catalog changes visible, and therefore requires
> registering invalidations for coherency.

Fair enough. How about the attached revision?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

Attachment

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15308: pg_dump: server version: 10.1.5; pg_dump version: 9.6.6 pg_dump: aborting because of server version
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: could not read block 0 in file : read only 0 of 8192 bytes whendoing nasty on immutable index function