On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure that just because the bug wasn't reported by a user, makes it
> any less critical. As Tomas pointed down thread, the nature of the bug is
> such that the users may not discover it very easily, but that doesn't mean
> it couldn't be affecting them all the time. We can now correlate many past
> reports of index corruption to this bug, but we don't have evidence to prove
> that. Lack of any good tool or built-in checks probably makes it even
> harder.
I think that we need to make an automated checker tool a requirement
for very complicated development projects in the future. We're behind
here.
--
Peter Geoghegan
