On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:44 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > I will make this change to HEAD soon, barring objections.
>
> +1. Not deleting the upper page seems better than the alternatives.
FWIW it might also work that way as a holdover from the old page
deletion algorithm. These days we decide exactly which pages (leaf
page plus possible internal pages) are to be deleted as a whole up
front (these are a subtree, though usually just a degenerate
single-leaf-page subtree -- internal page deletions are rare).
One of the advantages of this design is that we verify practically all
of the work involved in deleting an entire subtree up-front, inside
_bt_lock_subtree_parent(). It's clearly safe to back out of it if it
looks dicey.
--
Peter Geoghegan
